"Education aims at independence of judgement. Propaganda offers ready-made opinion for the unthinking herd."
THEMALAYPRESS - FIKIR DENGAN KRITIS | TERUS MELANGKAH LEBIH JAUH.

Assalamu'alaikum wbt dan salam sejahtera. Terima kasih kepada para pembaca yang masih setia mengikuti blog ini!
~ MOHAB (Blog layout versi 1 September 2014 - 17.07.2014 - 19 Ramadhan 1435)

Selasa, Julai 04, 2017

KIAS TERSIRAT: KISAH KAFUR BARUS DAN RAHSIANYA

0 comments


"Syiar Islam mula tersebar luas ke Alam Melayu semenjak 1438H yang lampau, yakni di zaman Nabi Muhammad Rasulullah s.a.w dan para sahabat. Bukan lewat seperti dakwaan orientalis barat yang punya agenda tersembunyi dan jelas menyeleweng daripada kebenaran. Maka sejarah itu wajib diperbetulkan..." - TMP

Temubual EKSKLUSIF bersama Penjaga Makam atau Juru Pelihara Makam Purba khasnya Pak Zahirudin Pasaribu sukarelawan yang menjaga Kompleks Permakaman Sahabat Nabi Muhammad s.a.w di Barus semenjak tahun 1980 (36) tahun lalu.

Berikut adalah sebahagian clip video yang dapat dikongsikan buat peminat-peminat sejarah realiti yang selama ini ternanti-nanti perkembangan #TMPTV selanjutnya mengenai #sirisejarahrealiti dan buku #kiastersirat

Terima kasih kerana setia menanti dan semoga SEJARAH REALITI kembali di tempat selayaknya.

Herman Abdullah | The Malay Press | Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia | 2017


Read full post »

Ahad, Mei 20, 2012

Rebuilding The Old? - Uighur Dilemma.

0 comments
August 2009

Ever since the violence between Muslim Uighurs and Han Chinese, a fear of fanaticism has taken hold. Is the government's decision to demolish the Uighur area Kashgar really due to an earthquake threat?


Kashgar is a cultural icon. Parts of the city have stood for 2000 years and within its labyrinth, Uighur traditions are unchanged. 'We live as we did in the old times' says Tursun, a 6 generation pot thrower.

But times are changing. Beijing's deputy mayor has announced that destruction of the old town is the only way to prepare for an earthquake threat. 'I spent my whole childhood in this place. If they destroy it, we can't continue our business' cries one of Kashgar's many blacksmiths. Many Uighur's are convinced that the authorities 'never tell the truth'. 

Yet some are happy to be rehoused in government buildings, admitting that their homes are dangerous. Kashgar is of great strategic value for China - if small separatist groups here link with Taliban insurgents across the border, there could be a full-scale armed conflict in Western China. 'If a handful of religious extremists, or international terrorists appear, we will crack down on them immediately' says Beijing's deputy mayor. His plan could rebuild a sour relationship. Or give the Uighurs a new reason to throw off Chinese occupation of their homeland.

Produced by ABC Australia, distributed by Journeyman Pictures
Read full post »

Jumaat, November 11, 2011

Angkorcalypse Now

0 comments
An Apocalypse (Greek: ἀποκάλυψις apokálypsis; "lifting of the veil" or "revelation") is a disclosure of something hidden from the majority of mankind in an era dominated by falsehood and misconception.


Bayon, the state temple at Angkor Thom, [it is believed by the west that] Jayavarman VII’s (1181-c.1218) walled city.
Who actually built it?

Prasat Angkor
"Unlike most Angkorian temples, Angkor Wat is oriented to the west; scholars are divided as to the significance of this. Further evidence for this view is provided by the bas-reliefs, which proceed in a counter-clockwise direction—prasavya in Hindu terminology—as this is the reverse of the normal order. Rituals take place in reverse order during Brahminic funeral services. The temple is admired for the grandeur and harmony of the architecture, its extensive bas-reliefs, and for the numerous devatas (guardian spirits) adorning its walls." - Uncle Wiki

French postcard about Angkor Wat in 1911.
Henri Mouhot popularised the temple in the west in the mid 19th-century


The 1000 year old ruins of Angkor Wat, are just a couple miles to the north the small town of Siem Reap, Cambodia.
Can you count how many 'Kampongs' are there in Cambodia?

"Nobody sent me. I sent myself here.." a quote.

HAB
Angkor
Kingdom of Cambodia, 2011


Apocalypse Now, A Film History & the Sacrificial Water Buffalo



Bayon Temple, Cambodia
Photos by Simon Glassock


This article was written by Simon Glassock

Francis Ford Coppola’s Apocalypse Now is one of the most famous of all Hollywood films. It is a transposition of Joseph Conrad’s novel, Heart of Darkness, from the jungles of 19th century Belgian Congo to the jungles of Indochina during the Vietnam War. Released in 1979, just four years after the fall of Saigon, it has become one of the defining artistic representations of that traumatic conflict. Like the book, the film traces a river journey up-country in search of a European so far removed from his own civilisation that he has ‘gone native’ and, by reason of this deracination, mad.

In Coppola’s version a renegade Special Forces officer, Colonel Kurtz, has raised an army from the Montagnard (or Moi, in Vietnamese) tribes of the Central Highlands of Vietnam and is leading them in an independent war against the Viet Cong from his base at an abandoned Cambodian temple. Kurtz has allowed himself to be deified by his followers and is assuming the power of life and death over all who come within his reach. With rumour about Kurtz and his methods swirling wildly, even among the North Vietnamese, American military command in Saigon decides that he has become an unstable liability and Captain Willard is sent on a clandestine mission to terminate Kurtz' command, 'with extreme prejudice’.

Filming on location began in March 1976; a mere two months later Typhoon Olga struck, destroying the set and other equipment with an estimated loss of $1.3 million.

Marlon Brando’s portrayal of the insane Kurtz was itself more than a little eccentric. He arrived on location for his three week shoot grossly overweight, demanding to be filmed almost entirely in shadow and insisting on an ad lib script since he declined to learn any lines, let alone read the novel upon which the film was based. In an interview 30 years later Coppola reported that Brando’s script was worked up from recorded conversations he had had with the actor, who would then learn his lines by listening to recordings through an earpiece. Coppola may also have resorted to reading Conrad’s novel out loud to his star, though in the same interview he declared that Brando did finally read the book, if only the night before his filming started.

The other lead actor, Martin Sheen, was battling alcoholism and suffered a near-fatal heart attack during filming which necessitated his brother being flown in to act as a double. Quantities of drugs and alcohol were ingested by the cast and crew and the temple complex was at one stage decorated, for want of a more appropriate word, with real corpses.

Several scenes from the film have arguably slipped into the public consciousness and helped define the war itself: to the rising crescendo of Wagner's Ride of the Valkyries Lieutenant Colonel Kilgore's helicopters attack a Vietnamese village so that Lance Johnson can surf 'Charlie’s break'; Kilgore strides around the beach, inviolate under fire and intoning the line that has probably accompanied a thousand charred barbecue sausages:

I love the smell of napalm in the morning.

And all the while, a rock and roll soundtrack punctuates the episodes of death and destruction surrounding Willard on his journey upriver. Some of the most arresting images, however, come in the climactic closing scenes of the film which feature a graphic and disturbing sequence in which the sacrificial slaughter of a water buffalo is interleaved with Kurtz’s own execution.

Although these scenes appear to be highly stylised, the sacrifice was not improvised but part of a ceremony held by the Ifugao people, who had been recruited to play the Montagnards, and drawn to Coppola’s attention by his wife. The final act begins with Kurtz, silhouetted in the doorway to his temple sanctum, handing a buffalo to his followers. Illuminated only by lightning, massed ranks of candles and the guttering flames of torches, the buffalo is led to a carved stake, around which etiolated figures are dancing. To the accompaniment of a rapid, monotone drumming, men with shields and spears surround the motionless beast and shuffle rhythmically back and forth, enacting in symbolic slow-motion their killing thrusts. This puppetry is brutally swept aside as four parang-wielding men in loin-cloths step forward and hack down hard and fast and again and again into the animal’s body. Just as Kurtz is cut down by Willard, the buffalo is all but decapitated at the shoulders, its hind-quarters almost severed at the haunches.

As Coppola acknowledged, it was fortuitous that this sacred, and therefore blameless, violence took place at precisely the moment when he was seeking a way in which to portray Kurtz’s own death:

I was really desperately looking for a way to end the film, as the original script had an ending more appropriate for a war film in the style of A Bridge Too Far. So I decided, after much thought and conversation, to have Martin end by assassinating the great king (Kurtz), and utilise the fact that the Ifagao (sic) people were going to sacrifice their water buffalo on our last day of shooting. 
Perhaps too, the film was by now touched by a certain madness which demanded a blood offering to expiate its own sins and fully complete the process of creation. Whatever the reason, Coppola deliberately associated the sacrifice with Kurtz’s death, underlining the symmetry of their fates by showing Kurtz gifting the buffalo to his followers just as he acquiesces in his own destruction and delivers himself up to Willard's blade. At an artistic level the scene provides as powerful and logical a conclusion as exists in the visual arts, no matter how disturbing the content may be to some in the audience.

But, whether Coppola was aware of it, it was also entirely consistent to include an animal sacrifice that took place in the Philippines in a film set in Vietnam and Cambodia. More than a quarter of a century earlier Norman Lewis had travelled in Indo-China to report on the Viet Minh war against the French re-occupation of Vietnam after the Second World War. In A Dragon Apparent Lewis recorded his impressions of the Montagnard tribes of Vietnam and recalled witnessing a sacrifice at a Jarai village near Pleiku in which a buffalo was tied to a stake, hamstrung by men with coupe-coupes, the Jarai half-knife, half-axe, and then speared to death. Lewis also visited the Khmer ruins around Siem Reap in Cambodia where he may have seen the reliefs showing scenes of daily life which run around Bayon, the state temple at Ankgor Thom, Jayavarman VII’s (1181-c.1218) walled city.

Among these can be found a panel featuring a group of men with raised spears surrounding a buffalo tied to a stake. The depiction is realised with enormous skill. The taut figures, gathering to deliver their blows, threaten to escape the confines of the stone from which they are carved and the buffalo stares at the viewer, demanding participation in the unfolding drama. The sculptor holds life and death in delicate balance, suspending the moment but unable to change the outcome. The sacrifice is as real and imminent today as it was when the frieze was carved 800 years ago.

Although Buddhism became the Khmer state religion under Jayavarman VII the ritual portrayed at Bayon evidently predated the temple by a considerable time. No matter that the Khmer capital had been located at Angkor since the ninth century, the Moi regarded Angkor Thom as the product of “strangers recently arrived in the country”.

(Before the Vietnam War, the population of the Central Highlands, estimated at between 3 and 3.5 million, was almost exclusively Degar @ Montagnard as known by the French. Today, the population is approximately 4 million, of whom about 1 million are Degars. The 30 or so Degar tribes in the Central Highlands comprise more than six different ethnic groups who speak languages drawn primarily from the Malayo-Polynesian, Tai, and Mon–Khmer language families. The main tribes, in order of population, are the Jarai, Rhade, Bahnar, Koho, Mnong, and Stieng.)

Lewis knew that the Jarai are related to, among others, the Igorot of Luzon in the northern Philippines but he may not have known that the sacrifice he witnessed was also a religious-cultural practice shared with tribes across south Asia, ranging from India through Indo-China to Indonesia, and including the Igorot, of which the Ifugao are a constituent. Water buffalo are of particular significance to these peoples. Lewis claimed that the buffalo was considered by the Moi to be more than an animal and hardly less than a human and it may be that they act as a substitute for human sacrifice. Not only are they routinely offered to appease ancestral spirits and to safeguard public constructions  (Lewis’ buffalo was killed to place a school building under the protection of tribal spirits, and, perhaps, the depiction on the Bayon frieze was of a sacrifice for Jayavarman’s temple) but, more pertinent here, they also assume special importance in funerary rites where they function as the symbolic carrier of the deceased’s soul to the afterlife.

Probably unwittingly, Coppola’s finale was thus thoroughly grounded in ethnographic reality to the extent that the buffalo sacrifice in his film is an almost exact copy of the Bayon panel. But without artistic intuition this alone, even if intentional, would be mere mechanics. Coppola's transformation of violence into art was achieved by making Kurtz complicit in the sacrificial nature of his own death by allowing Willard to perform an act that had been sanctioned and legitimised by an authority greater than either man's.

Crucially, Kurtz acknowledged this by giving his Montagnard followers a water-buffalo, the symbolic means by which to celebrate his death and convey his soul to the afterlife.

end.

* just for your reading pleasure ... well just read it over and over until you comprehend.
Read full post »

Rabu, Oktober 26, 2011

Binaan Cham Tower Idea Firaun?

3 comments
Binaan Menara ini sangat kemas saling tak tumpah macam di Ayuthia. Tetapi yang peliknya saya tidak nampak langsung kelibat patung hindu atau buddha melainkan yang diletakkan kemudian.

Salah satu kepakaran Orang Cham dizaman purbakala yang telah dikenalpasti adalah seni binaan banggunan yang menggunakan batu-bata merah. Binaan ini terdapat disepanjang pantai timur Viet Nam. Ianya selalu terbina ditanah tinggi yang menghadap laut dan juga menghadap tanah pamah. Logiknya menara yang menghadap laut itu dibina adalah bagi tujuan pemantauan aktiviti nelayan mahupun perkapalan manakala yang menghadap tanah pamah pula dibina bagi memantau aktiviti pertanian atau penternakan.

Sebuah pemandangan Laut Champa yang ingin dikongsikan bersama pembaca setia TMP.
(I think you are ready to see...the Sea)

Ironinya rumah-rumah orang kebanyakkan/rakyat jelata Cham terbina daripada binaan kayu dan beratap nipah lekeh berbanding binaan menara yang tersergam indah. Oleh kerana perbezaan yang ketara itu maka persoalan mula timbul, siapakah sebenarnya yang menjadi arkitek pembinaan batu bata merah Menara Cham Tower dan daripada manakah mereka mewarisi idea dan kepakaran itu?

Menara Firaun dan Empire State Building - Gambar Hiasan

Sejarah mengatakan bahawa binaan itu dibina oleh kerajaan Champa seawal 781 masehi (lebih kurang begitulah). Tetapi penulis berpendapat ia sebenarnya terbina lebih awal daripada itu dan kepakaran itu adalah kepakaran 'mason' daripada luar yang kemudiannya diajarkan kepada kontraktor tempatan yang bekerja pula untuk pemerintah yang seterusnya.

Manakala menara yang telah sedia ada itu diwarisi pula oleh dynasti raja-raja Cham sehinggalah raja Cham yang terakhir yang dikatakan kalah ditangan raja Viet Nam, dan ada juga dikatakan kalah di tangan Sukhotai. Dalam pada masa yang sama sebelum itu perhubungan antara wilayah-wilayah di Indo China telah pun berlaku dan terjadilah inter-marriage sesama pemerintah wilayah-wilayah di Nusantara ini.

Dan orang Cham ini seperti yang kita ketahui ada dua kelompok; satu yang telah Islam, manakala satu lagi yang masih mengamal kepercayaan lama, menyeru dan menyembah semangat dan roh nenek moyang mereka yang berlawanan sekali dengan dakwaan barat yang mengatakan mereka ini penganut agama hindu atau buddha.

Kepercayaan nenek moyang ini samalah seperti juga bangsa China yang menyembah Tok Kong Merah padahal Tok Kong itu adalah idol kepada Yafits iaitu anak Nabi Noh tok nek moyang mereka juga. Tok Kong Merah itu bukannya hindu atau buddha sebagaimana yang dianggap oleh sesetengah pihak. (Ada juga riwayat yang mengatakan antara kisah-kisah lain yang tergambar oleh Tok Kong Merah itu mengambil epik cerita daripada Syair Siti Zubaidah yang mencari suaminya Syed Zainal Abidin yang merantau ke negeri China)

Kaedah perubahan  agama itu samalah seperti mana mereka yang taksub kepada Laksamana Cheng Ho lalu membuat patung dan menyembahnya. Itu adalah naluri manusia yang terpesong dek bisikan iblis, lihat sahajalah Amirikan Idol...bukankah Idol itu maksudnya patung? Buddha itu pun asalnya manusia tetapi dibuat patung lalu disembah juga.

Belum ingin mengulas lanjut, tetapi jika bangsa Cham itu dikatakan rumpun bangsa Melayu yang berkait dengan sebahagian daripada kita pada hari ini, walaupun mereka akhirnya terpesong jauh daripada segi iktikad tetapi nampaknya raja-raja mereka itu lebih maju berbanding raja Empayar Melayu di Melaka. Sebab jelas nampak mereka ada bukti. Kesultanan Melayu Melaka tiada bukti melainkan istana jadian kayu kayan dan rumah nelayan. Dan adalah logik juga tok nenek bangsa Cham ini dulu asalnya beragama Islam.

Cuma kita tidak pasti bilakah masanya orang Cham mula kembali menerima cahaya Islam. Dan yang pasti Islam datang ke Tanah Semenanjung lebih awal daripada Cham dan buktinya adalah Undang-undang Kedah 222 hijrah. Dan dikatakan bahawa Merong Mahawangsa tidak turun melalui Laut Timur @ Laut Champa @ Laut China Selatan tetapi melalui Burma, Laut Andaman dan terus ke Gunung Jerai, Kedah.

Kita tinggalkan dahulu masalah bangsa Cham, kita kembali kepada persoalan asal iaitu binaan batu bata.

Maka untuk menjawab persoalan teknologi purba pembinaan batu-bata ini kita akan pergi kepada dua perkara; yang pertama kisah batu-bata dan keduanya kisah Iktiqad Firaun bahawa Tuhan Musa a.s ada dilangit.

Maka disini dibawakan satu kisah daripada Al Quran yang menceritakan tentang kisah batu bata yang mana Firaun beriktiqad bahawa Tuhan Nabi Musa a.s berada di langit dalam surah Al Qasas 38 berbunyi:

Dan Fir'aun pula berkata, "Wahai orang-orangku! Aku tidak mengetahui ada bagi kamu sebarang tuhan yang lain daripadaku. Oleh itu wahai Haman! Bakarlah untukku batu-bata, serta binalah untukku banggunan yang tinggi, supaya aku naik melihat Tuhan Musa (yang dikatakannya itu) dan sesungguhnya aku percaya adalah Musa daripada orang-orang yang berdusta."

Oleh kerana itu, orang yang bertanya tentang dimana Allah dan orang yang menjawab bahawa 'Allah berada diatas langit dengan ZatNya', sebenarnya meniru Firaun dalam perkara ini bukannya Salafussoleh.

Manakala hadis yang mengatakan terdapat perbualan antara seorang wanita dan Rasullullah s.a.w yang mana apabila Rasullullah s.a.w bertanya kepadanya "Dimanakah Allah?" Jawab perempuan itu "Di langit." Hadis ini tidak sohih tetapi ia adalah hasan. Ia adalah hadis-hadis yang diriwayatkan dengan makna.
Rumah Api Firaun - Gambar Hiasan

Penulis tidak dapat hendak menerangkan dengan lebih lanjut tentang perkara ini buat masa ini, cuma dalam masa hendak mencari kisah batu-bata itu terjumpa pula kisah Firaun dengan Nabi Musa a.s. 

Manakala bab masalah iktikad Firaun itu sebaik-baiknya para pembaca mencari Tok Guru yang bertauliah untuk menerangkannya dengan lebih lanjut tentang dalil-dalil atau nas untuk menafikan dakwaan sesetengah pihak yang mengatakan Tuhan itu bertempat dan duduk pula dilangit.

Tetapi yang pasti, kisah binaan batu-bata ini memang jelas terdapat didalam Al Quran. Maka secara teorinya kepandaian purbakala itu telah diwariskan kepada raja-raja berikutnya sehingalah kepada raja-raja yang memerintah bangsa Cham dan ada riwayat yang mengatakan binaan-binaan Cham itu adalah warisan Po Nain (Funan), anak lelaki kedua Raja Iskandar Zulkarnain yang beragama Islam (Tauhid) yang pernah memerintah sebahagian besar Indo China. 

Jadi tidak menghairankan jika ada pihak mendakwa binaan Cham itu asalnya idea pemerintah Islam yang mengikut syariat nabi Ibrahim a.s sebelum terpesong jauh selepas zamannya sehingga melewati zaman Firaun dan kemudian diutuskan pula Junjungan Besar Nabi Muhammad s.a.w kembali mengajak manusia ke jalan kebenaran yang hakiki. 

Tidak terkecuali rahmat itu sampai ke Nusantara melalui utusan Rasullullah s.a.w melalui para sahabat baginda seperti Saad Abi Waqas r.a yang datang untuk menanam kembali benih tauhid. Manakala tugas itu diserahkan pula kepada Merong Mahawangsa juag dikatakan keturunan Iskandar Zulkarnain, lalu datanglah baginda membawa amanah dan tanggungjawab umpama kiasan menyiram tunas muda yang tunggu cambah - no san ta ra.

Manakala hasil usaha Sultan Muzaffar Syah 1@ Merong Mahawangsa itu, jadilah induk Islam di Nusantara ini berada di Kedah, Pelabuhan Melaka yang sebenar. Dan daripada jalan pintas dari Laut Kedah ke Laut Champa itulah pendakwah-pendakwah membawa syiar Islam ke Champa. Dan jikalau diselidiki dengan secara lebih terperinci, kebanyakkan kitab-kitab pondok di Indo China sebenarnya diambil daripada Tanah Semenanjung hasil karangan ulama-ulama Tanah Jawi yang berbahasa Melayu.

Dan seterusnya tanggungjawab menyebarkan Islam yang asalnya telah ditunaikan oleh Merong Mahawangsa itu tergalas pula pada raja-raja selepasnya, raja-raja Melayu yang mengamal majlis adat istiadat Raja Iskandar Zulkarnain yang bernobat pula lagu Ibrahim Khalillullah (UUK).

Dan semestinya bukan Raja Ka KicKapooooooooooooooooooooooor.

Wassalam.

Sumber: Agamamu Dalam Bahaya oleh Al Allamah Abu Abdullah Alawi Al Yaman, 2001, Sofa Production.

Read full post »

Sabtu, Jun 27, 2009

Made in China

4 comments
Trade Route Discovery
Heavy with Chinese cargo, the ship that sank off Belitung in the early ninth century was an Arab dhow. The wreck gives scholars an unprecendented time capsule of enterprise on the Maritime Silk Route, for centuries the nexus of international trade. Catching seasonal monsoon winds, merchants and mariners linked the Middle East to China through India and ports of call in between.
Scales varies in this perspective. Present-day place-names and boundaries shown. Dhow image from Biblioteque National de France


By Simon Worrall (National Geographic Magazine)
Photograph by Tony Law

(Kata kunci TMP - Keputeraan Rasullullah s.a.w 12 Rabiul Awal Tahun Gajah atau bersamaan dengan 20-22 April 571 Masihi, manakala Tang Dynasty ujud dari June 18, 618 – June 4, 907, iaitu sewaktu Rasullullah s.a.w berumur dalam lingkungan 47 tahun. Maka Baginda yang sememangnya seorang ahli perniagaan yang ulung semestinya tahu dua jaringan utama ke Asia-China iaitu Laluan Sutera Darat dan Laut. Maka sebab itu disuruh tuntut ilmu dan diutus Sayyidina Saad Abi Waqas ke China.

Manakala hubungan perniagaan dan diplomatik diantara kerajaan Tang dan Parsi yang terjalin sejak sekian lama memungkinkan gelaran-gelaran parsi dan nama parsi diguna pakai oleh sultan-sultan Malayu hari ini yang berasal dari Merong Mahawangsa - Sultan Muzaffar Syah 1 cucu Maharaja Sai Tee Sung. Kerana kerajaan China juga amat menghormati kerajaan Parsi.

Ini juga menunjukkan bahawa daerah Asia Tenggara ini sememangnya dibawah empayar Tang dan tempat pertemuan semua kapal dagang itu adalah di sekitar Selat Malaka dan Semenanjung Malaka - bahasa modennnya kawasan perdagangan @ perniagaan. Disinilah juga letaknya semua komoditi yang paling berkualiti di dunia - getah, bijih timah, sawit, rempah ratus dan minyak.

Oleh itu kawasan sekitar Selat Malaka adalah zon kawasan yang aman kerana dijaga oleh semua kuasa besar Islam di dunia pada waktu itu Arab-Parsi-India dan China. Jadi siapa pula yang berani menyerang orang yang telah Duduk di Sini @ Siam - Ma La Yu yang dikawal selia oleh Merong Mahawangsa? Bila masa pulak datangnya Geruda?

Teks ini juga membuktikan bahawa sememangnya kawasan No-san-ta-ra ini sudah mendapat syiar Islam (lebih awal dari Wali Songo abad ke 15-16) dan telah dikenali oleh seluruh kuasa besar ekonomi dunia waktu itu dan bukan terra incognita seperti yang di dakwa oleh Frankie Swettenham.

Walaupun berbagai bukti telah dikemukakan yang Islam telah betapak awal di No-san-ta-ra iaitu seawal 222 Hijrah (merujuk UUK bersamaan 837 Masihi), masih ada lagi yang tidak mahu mengakui hakikat yang sebenarnya, masih lagi mahu bertuankan Melayu Parameswara Hindu.

Apa la malang nasib Bangsa dan Agama ku yang masih lagi dihina oleh penulis-penulis upahan dari bangsanya sendiri...minta ampunlah ke Tuhan)

The world economy in the ninth century had two powerful engines. One was Tang dynasty China, an empire stretching from the South China Sea to the borders of Persia, with ports open to foreign traders from far and wide. The Tang welcomed diverse people to its capital, Changan, the site of modern-day Xian, and multiethnic groups lived side by side in a city of a million—a population unmatched by a Western city until London in the early 19th century. Then, as today, China was an economic powerhouse—and much of that power was built on trade.

The other economic engine was Baghdad, capital of the Abbasid dynasty from 762 onward. That dynasty inherited the Muslim world in the Middle East; by 750 it had spread as far as the Indus River to the east and Spain to the west, bringing with it trade, commerce, and the religion of Islam (the Prophet Muhammad himself had been a merchant).

Linking the two economic powerhouses were the Silk Road and its watery counterpart, the Maritime Silk Route. The overland road gets all the attention, but ships had likely been plying the seas between China and the Persian Gulf since the time of Christ. In tune with the cycle of the monsoon winds, this network of sea-lanes and harbors bound East and West in a continuous exchange of goods and ideas.

Tang China was hungry for fine textiles, pearls, coral, and aromatic woods from Persia, East Africa, and India. In return, China traded paper, ink, and above all, silk. Silk, light and easily rolled up, could travel overland. But by the ninth century, ceramics from China had grown popular as well, and camels were not well suited for transporting crockery (think of those humps). So increasing quantities of the dishes and plates that held the meals of wealthy Persian Gulf merchants arrived by sea in Arab, Persian, and Indian ships. It was a long and perilous journey. And some times a ship just vanished, like a plane off a radar screen.

Since time immemorial, ships have come to grief in the Gelasa Strait, a funnel-shaped passage between the small Indonesian islands of Bangka and Belitung, where turquoise waters conceal a maze of submerged rocks and reefs. Despite the dangers, sea cucumber divers were working the area a decade ago when, 51 feet down, they came across a coral block with ceramics embedded in it. They pulled several intact bowls from inside a large jar, took them ashore, and sold them.

The divers had stumbled upon the most impor tant marine archaeological discovery ever made in Southeast Asia: a ninth-century Arab dhow filled with more than 60,000 handmade pieces of Tang dynasty gold, silver, and ceramics. The ship and its cargo, now referred to as the Belitung wreck, were like a time capsule of proof that Tang China, like China today, mass-produced trade goods and exported them by sea. Working in shifts until the monsoon stopped them, a team of divers retrieved the ancient artifacts.

The treasure—much of it, anyway—turned out to be the Tang equivalent of Fiestaware: so-called Changsha bowls, named after the Changsha kilns in Hunan where they were produced. Tall stoneware jars served as ninth-century shipping containers; each could hold more than a hundred nested bowls that might originally have been padded with rice straw, a sort of organic bubble wrap. Scholars already knew that such simple, functional tea bowls had been exported worldwide from the eighth to the tenth centuries: Shards of them had been found at sites as far afield as Indonesia and Persia. But few of the bowls had ever been found intact.

Now the Java Sea had yielded up a shipload, many perfectly preserved—protected in the stoneware jars from the scouring action of sand on the seafloor. Sponged clean, their glazes shone as brightly as the day they were fired.

The handmade bowls give evidence of "factory-like production," says John Miksic, an American professor at Singapore's National University who is an expert on Southeast Asian archaeology. They are the earliest known exported examples of their kind. "The cargo also implies an organizer with managerial skill," Miksic says, "and huge quantities of imported raw materials." Cobalt for blue-and-white ceramics, for example, came from Iran; it was not recovered from ore in China until much later.

Although Arab mariners clearly plied the Maritime Silk Route, trading on a large scale over great distances, "this is the first Arab dhow discovered in Southeast Asian waters," says John Guy, senior curator of South and Southeast Asian Art at the Metropolitan Museum in New York, "and the richest and largest consignment of early ninth-century southern Chinese gold and ceramics ever discovered in a single hoard."

A reconstruction suggests the craft was similar to a kind of sailing vessel still found in Oman and known as a baitl qarib. Almost 60 feet long, with a raked prow and stern, it was built of Afri can and Indian wood and fitted with a square sail. Its most distinctive feature was that instead of being held together with dowels or nails, its planks and beams were literally sewn together, probably with coir, a coconut-husk fiber.

The dhow's port of departure and destination are still uncertain. No logbooks survived, no bills of lading, no maps. But most scholars believe that it was bound for the Middle East, possibly the Iraqi port city of Al Basrah (now Basra). It probably set sail from Guangzhou, the largest of the ports linked by the Maritime Silk Route. In the ninth century an estimated 10,000 foreign traders and merchants, many of them Arabs and Persians, lived in Guangzhou.

Among the tens of thousands of Changsha bowls found in the wreck, one was inscribed with this message: "the 16th day of the seventh month of the second year of the Baoli reign," or A.D. 826 on the Western calendar. This is almost certainly when the bowl was fired. Then, as now, goods did not sit around on the wharf for long, so the ship probably embarked not long afterward.

The serial nature of the cargo (along with the bowls, it included 763 identical inkpots, 915 spice jars of various sizes, 1,635 ewers) and the geographic diversity of its production (from at least five kilns widely dispersed over China) suggest that these were export items made to order. Decorations show the eclecticism of the global market. There is something for everyone: Buddhist lotus symbols and motifs from Central Asia and Persia. Objects bearing geometric decorations and Koranic inscriptions were clearly aimed at the Islamic market. White ceramicware as well as green-splashed bowls and ewers are known to have been popular in Iran. One bowl was inscribed with five loose vertical lines, inter preted by some scholars as a symbol whose meaning resonates powerfully in today's world: Allah.



Made in China

A 1,200 year-old shipwreck opens a window an ancient global trade (lihat kaligrafi Allah dan juga bunga Lotus)


Like the shiploads of sneakers or electronics stamped "Made in China" today, most of the items recovered from the dhow were trade goods. But at the stern of the ship, divers found a trove of gold and silver and high-grade ceramics whose significance is more mysterious.

Peeling back a cloud of white, acid-free paper, Alvin Chia holds up a cup in gloved hands. "This is the largest Tang dynasty gold cup ever found," he says. Chia is an executive with Singapore's Sentosa Leisure Group, which joined with the Singapore government to beat out several museums and bought the entire cargo in 2005 for more than $30 million. It may one day be the core of a Maritime Silk Route museum.

Chia points out that two men depicted on the cup's thumb plate look Central Asian rather than Chinese, with long, curly hair and thick beards. On the cup's side panels are figures in motion: a Persian dancer clapping her hands above her head, musicians playing various instruments. In Tang China, Chia explains, music and dance from eastern Persia were all the rage.

A large, exquisitely decorated silver flask might offer a clue to the purpose of the hoard. "See the pair of mandarin ducks?" Chia asks. "They are a symbol of matrimonial harmony. On ornamental boxes everything is also in pairs: a pair of birds, a pair of deer, a pair of ibexes." Perhaps these were gifts for a royal wedding in the Persian Gulf—a bride's treasure of the sort rarely seen outside of China.

Since China first began trading with the world more than 2,000 years ago, it has opened and closed like a clamshell. During the Tang dynasty the clamshell was wide open and remained so for many centuries. A string of inventions—gun powder, paper, printing, and cast iron—had set China on course to become the world's leading economic power. Trade with the West had steadily expanded, with Chinese seafarers taking an increasingly dominant role.

When the great admiral Zheng He set sail in 1405 with a fleet of 317 ships, China ruled the waves. "If you had been sitting in a spaceship looking down on Earth, and you had observed developments from the ninth to the 15th century," says John Miksic, "you would have thought that the Chinese would take the next step—explore the Atlantic and become the dominant world culture." But throughout Chinese history, there has been another, equally powerful force at work: a distrust of merchants and the foreign influences they import, dating back to Confucius, who believed trade and commerce should not dictate Chinese culture and values.

In A.D. 878, little more than half a century after the Belitung ship sank, a rebel leader named Huang Chao burned and pillaged Guangzhou, killing tens of thousands of Muslims, Jews, Christians, and Parsis. And not long after Zheng He's voyages, when Columbus reached the New World, the Confucian worldview won the day; China burned its fleet and turned inward. The Silk Road and the Maritime Silk Route, which had linked China to the world, lapsed into disuse. The Portuguese entered the Indian Ocean, and by the late 17th and early 18th centuries, Europe had begun to dominate world trade. "The whole of world history would have been different if the Chinese had not gone into their shell for 500 years," Miksic says.

Now China competes with India to be the world's workshop. China is open as never before and once again trading with its ancient partners in the Middle East. Iran, for instance, supplies 12 percent of China's oil. In return, Beijing provides machinery and locomotives, builds subways and railroads, and helps Tehran exploit its vast mineral resources, closing the loop from the ninth century, when cobalt was shipped from Persia to China for the blue-and-white ceramics found on the Belitung ship.

"The ancient networks are restored through industries and factories in a world that is now globalized," says Wang Gungwu, a historian at the National University of Singapore.

For how long this time is anybody's guess. 

Tambahan sikit (kenapa Pedang Turki ada simbol Naga?):

* During the Islamic conquest of Persia (633–656), the son of the last ruler of the Sassanid Empire, Prince Pirooz, fled to Tang China. According to the Book of Tang, Pirooz was made the head of a Governorate of Persia in what is now Zaranj, Afghanistan. During this conquest of Persia, the Islamic Caliph Uthman Ibn Affan (r. 644–656) sent an embassy to the Tang court at Chang'an.

* On June 11, 758, an Abbasid embassy arrived at Chang'an simultaneously with the Uyghur Turks in order to pay tribute.

* On two occasions between 635 to 636, Tang royal princesses were married to Turk mercenaries or generals in Chinese service. Throughout the Tang Dynasty until the end of 755, there were approximately ten Turkic generals serving under the Tang. While most of the Tang army was made of fubing Chinese conscripts, the majority of the troops led by Turkic generals were of non-Chinese origin, campaigning largely in the western frontier where the presence of fubing troops was low. Some "Turkic" troops were nomadisized Han Chinese, a desinicized people.

TIBET VS TANG bukan juga baru...

* There was a long string of conflicts with Tibet over territories in the Tarim Basin between 670–692 and in 763 the Tibetans even captured the capital of China, Chang'an, for fifteen days during the An Shi Rebellion. In fact, it was during this rebellion that the Tang withdrew its western garrisons stationed in what is now Gansu and Qinghai, which the Tibetans then occupied along with the territory of what is now Xinjiang. Hostilities between the Tang and Tibet continued until they signed a formal peace treaty in 821. The terms of this treaty, including the fixed borders between the two countries, are recorded in a bilingual inscription on a stone pillar outside the Jokhang temple in Lhasa.
Read full post »

Selasa, Mac 31, 2009

Bloodlines Vs Bloodlines

7 comments

Sedutan dari siri diatas bertujuan untuk menyatakan secara lebih jelas tentang apa yang telah dibentangkan oleh TMP sebelum ini (boleh didapati daripada entri-entri dibawah). Semoga para pembaca dapat memikir sejarah realiti dengan lebih mendalam dan melihat persekitaran serta alamat dunia hari ini dari sudut yang berbeza. Semoga Allah S.W.T membuka hati dan minda serta memberikan petunjuk kepada pembaca sekalian. Sesungguhnya keadaan semasa adalah amat kritikal.
Sila ikuti video dan sila baca link yang telah disediakan. Penerangan selanjutnya akan menyusul kemudian. Khasnya yang berkaitan dengan Empayar Islam Benua Siam Kedah. InsyaAllah.

Kisah Merlin yang ditayangkan di TV membuktikan lagi kenyataan yang mereka ini mempercayai sihir (istidrad) walaupun dari luarannya mereka hebat dengan teknologi-teknologi moden. Firaun juga adalah adalah seorang Presiden yang mempunyai ahli-ahli sihir hebat dan juga memiliki angkatan perang yang gah berteknologi moden pada waktu itu. Ke mana pula menghilangnya si Musa As Samiri selepas kejadian lembu emas? Namanya pula telah dipadamkan dalam Old dan New Testament oleh tangan-tangan jahat ahli kitab yang korup dan diganti dengan Aaron (Nabi Harun). Kisahnya Samiri ini telah disebut kembali dalam Al-Quran. Mengapa? Apa maknanya untuk kita yang berfikir?

Melalui sumber lain (seorang fakeh) mengatakan Samiri ini asalnya dari seorang bayi yang diselamatkan sewaktu perintah penghapusan beramai-ramai (genocide) 'new born son' bani Israel, tetapi dijaga secara rahsia oleh ahli sihir dan rahib-rahib Firaun semata-mata untuk dipersiapkan menentang Nabi Musa Allaihisallam. Manakala Nabi Musa dibawah peliharaan Allah SWT disusu oleh ibu kandungnya dalam Istana Firaun, Samiri pula dikenyangkan dengan susu anjing oleh ahli2 sihir Firaun. Tidak menghairankan, lihat sahaja perangai keturunan dan pengikut2nya, jelas tidak punya sifat kemanusian langsung! Tahukah pembaca nama sebenar berhala besar Statue of Liberty di Amirika sana?...Queen Semiramis.

"Samiri lari ke Amirika, dan pengikutnya ke Russia," tambah Tok Alim, membuatkan saya tersentak. Semuanya masuk akal kerana pernah bertemu petikan dibawah (siapa Rasputin?):

"It follows that if the forefathers of the Mandaens were the authors of the scrolls which the Templars unearthed [the 'treasure' buku sihir Kaballah], the mystical land beneath a star called 'Merica' might have been recorded in their secret writings. In short, it seemed possible that the Templars learnt a wonderful land beneath the bright lone star 'Merica' from the scrolls, and if so, there is a strong possibility they sailed west to find it" (Knight C & Lomas R, 1996, p76)

Ini juga mendatangkan logik, apa sahaja yang bermula dari Timur akan di label sebagai barbarik dan ketinggalan zaman. Jika mengikut sejarah, Empayar Islam menguasai bahagian Timur dunia. East vs West.

Seterusnya siapakah pula yang memegang rahsia magik Harut wa Marut, mengamalkan ajaran Syaitan dan ritual sihir Firaun itu hari ini? Mereka ada dikalangan kita! Maka yang kenal, kenal-lah, yang nampak, nampaklah. Kata Tok Alim (wiseman says), "Hanya mereka yang 'buta perut' tidak akan nampak...". Apa cerita Mona Fendi?

Realitinya pertembungan dua Musa itu sebenarnya belum selesai. Maka inilah dikatakan perang akhir zaman. Nostradamus dalam ramalannya: Century 1, Quatrain 63:

Pestilence is past, the world become smaller,
For a long time the lands will be inhabited peacefully.
People will travel safely through the sky [over] land and seas:
Then wars will startup again. (Nostradamus)

:.Seperti Firaun, elitis Presiden juga sangat percaya kepada segala 'prophecies' tersebut. Maka kelam kabutlah mereka mencari 'musuh yang dicari' dan membunuh, menjarah sesuka hati.

Good Vs Evil, Bloodlines Vs Bloodlines.Sir Vs Sihir.Hak Vs Batil. Tauhid Vs Syirik. Mukmin vs Kafir. Perang asalnya bermula sejak awal lagi; Habil dan Qabil (naluri incest) untuk dijadikan iktibar manusia dikemudian hari.

Sedar atau tidak, sejarah fantasi yang kita belajar hari ini penuh dengan kisah mistik dan sihir? Specially crafted manifestations to meet and match our culture...excalibur vs taming sari. lancelot vs hang tuah.Badang and The Swamp Demon.realiti vs fantasi.

Maka persiapkan dirimu wahai saudara-seagamaku yang dikasihi sekalian.

"aku menulis bukan kerna nama..."
Read full post »
 

Copyright © T H E . M A L A Y . P R E S S Design by Free CSS Templates | Blogger Theme by BTDesigner | Powered by Blogger